<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would President Obama Need More Secret Service Protection?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.transmyth.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=84" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.transmyth.com/blog/?p=84</link>
	<description>Technology Translator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.transmyth.com/blog/?p=84&#038;cpage=1#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transmyth.com/blog/?p=101#comment-101</guid>
		<description>You know what? I recant my earlier position on this topic. Previously, I had said that If Mr. Obama were elected, he should receive no more or less protection than any other president. At the time, this seemed like a tenable position, but after reading Mr. Hendricks&#039;s comment, I&#039;m going with what he said. The amount of protection should be equal to the amount of threat, as would be true for any president. That kind of is what I meant the first time, but Mr. Hendricks put it much better than I did.
&lt;i&gt;Pax,
Nelson&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what? I recant my earlier position on this topic. Previously, I had said that If Mr. Obama were elected, he should receive no more or less protection than any other president. At the time, this seemed like a tenable position, but after reading Mr. Hendricks&#8217;s comment, I&#8217;m going with what he said. The amount of protection should be equal to the amount of threat, as would be true for any president. That kind of is what I meant the first time, but Mr. Hendricks put it much better than I did.<br />
<i>Pax,<br />
Nelson</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anjuan</title>
		<link>http://www.transmyth.com/blog/?p=84&#038;cpage=1#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Anjuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transmyth.com/blog/?p=101#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Kevin,
Thanks for the comment as well as the post on your blog.  Your point is well said:  there is no &quot;one size fits all&quot; approach to protecting the President of the United States.  However, some people (as seen in the comments on my YouTube post) obviously disagree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,<br />
Thanks for the comment as well as the post on your blog.  Your point is well said:  there is no &#8220;one size fits all&#8221; approach to protecting the President of the United States.  However, some people (as seen in the comments on my YouTube post) obviously disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin D. Hendricks &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Secret Service Protection for a Black President?</title>
		<link>http://www.transmyth.com/blog/?p=84&#038;cpage=1#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin D. Hendricks &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Secret Service Protection for a Black President?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transmyth.com/blog/?p=101#comment-99</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter friend Anjuan  Simmons posted an interesting blog entry wondering if more Secret Service protection would be needed should Barack Obama become the first black president. The answer seems like a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter friend Anjuan  Simmons posted an interesting blog entry wondering if more Secret Service protection would be needed should Barack Obama become the first black president. The answer seems like a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin D. Hendricks</title>
		<link>http://www.transmyth.com/blog/?p=84&#038;cpage=1#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin D. Hendricks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transmyth.com/blog/?p=101#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Seems like a no-brainer to me. The level of security should match the level of the threat. It&#039;s not an issue of fairness--all presidents should get the same treatment, it&#039;s a matter of protection.

Kind of like in a war--you decide the size of your fighting force based on who you&#039;re fighting, not what you did in the last war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like a no-brainer to me. The level of security should match the level of the threat. It&#8217;s not an issue of fairness&#8211;all presidents should get the same treatment, it&#8217;s a matter of protection.</p>
<p>Kind of like in a war&#8211;you decide the size of your fighting force based on who you&#8217;re fighting, not what you did in the last war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
